Last updated: Tue Feb 07 13:43:48 +0000 2012

Thoughtful consideration, wisdom and foresight must prevail

My husband John and I, along with our dog Jett, make it a point to enjoy the beautiful natural places that we Pennsylvanians are so fortunate to possess. We often spend our summer weekends explorin...
Sleeping With the Enemy?

 Written by Joseph Kiesecker Published on February 25th, 2011  Originally published in CoolGreenScience. The Nature Conservancy works routinely with extractive industries – like oil and gas and min...
Catalyst for Conservation: New Book Chronicles Brandywine Conservancy’s Successful Work to Conserve King Ranch Property

Thousands of acres permanently protected from development help keep the Brandywine watershed healthy Catalyst for Conservation traces the history of the Brandywine Conservancy’s work to save ...
Environmental Advisory Committees and Historic Preservation

Environmental Advisory Committees and Historic Preservation At first glance a historic district appears to be separate from the purpose of an Environmental Advisory Committee at the township or cou...
Ailanthus altissima, a Problem Land Managers Can Eliminate

Ailanthus altissima, a Problem Land Managers Can Eliminate   Ailanthus altissima is one of many non-native invasive plants that plague land managers in Pennsylvania.  In our area, it is the mo...

Quote of the Day

“To forget how to dig the earth and to tend the soil is to forget ourselves.”
— Mohandas K. Gandhi
Sub_cap

National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor

Update - February 3, 2011

image

In 2008, the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association and Piedmont Environmental Council, along with four other organizations and a Virginia County, filed a lawsuit challenging the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) final designation of the Mid-Atlantic National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors (NIETC).

On February 1, 2011, the 9th Circuit Court ruled in our favor, effectively eliminating the Mid-Atlantic and Southwest designations. The court ruled on the basis that DOE failed to conduct an environmental review as required by the National Environmental Policy Act and failed to consult with affected states. 

Here's a quote from the opinion:

"We determine that DOE failed to properly consult with the affected States in conducting the Congestion Study and failed to undertake any environmental study for its NIETC Designation as required by the National Environmental Protection Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4332(C). We also determine that these failings were not harmless errors. Accordingly, we vacate the Congestion Study and NIETC designation and remand the cases to the DOE for further proceedings."

This decision will not stop construction of transmission lines that are currently underway (e.g., TrAIL line), but could greatly impact future transmission line proposals.  

Read the Decision

Background

A National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor (NIETC) is a geographic area in which new oversight processes and the power of eminent domain can be employed to facilitate the construction of high voltage, interstate transmission lines. The new processes override traditional state siting authority, supplanting long-standing state regulation with new federal oversight. A NIETC is created when so designated by the US Department of Energy (DOE) in response to a request from an entity such as a power company or a regional transmission operator. 

Within areas designated as NIETCs, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is granted backstop siting authority, an unprecedented mechanism for overriding state approval processes. Backstop siting authority can be invoked one year after a transmission application has been filed by a transmission company. Many, in particular organizations dedicated to the protection of parks, wild lands, scenic rivers, and historic monuments, are concerned with the threats posed by the design of the backstop siting process and the manner in which the new law is being implemented.

Corridor Designation

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 required DOE to conduct a study of electric transmission congestion within one year of the enactment of the law and than every three years thereafter. Based on its conjestion study findings, DOE was required, through EPAct 2005, to designate any geographic area experiencing electric energy transmission capacity constraints or congestion that adversely affects consumers as a national interest electric transmission corridor (“NIETC”). 

The DOE Congestion Study (LINK to Congestion Studies) was issued on August 8, 2006. On April 26, 2007, the DOE issued two draft NIETCs—Draft Mid-Atlantic Area National Corridor (some or all counties in Delaware, Ohio, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia) and Draft Southwest Area National Corridor (seven counties in southern California, three counties in western Arizona, and one county in southern Nevada). 

On October 2, 2007, DOE announced the final designations of two NIETCs—the Mid-Atlantic Area National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor (Docket No. 2007-OE-01 - LINK) and the Southwest Area National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor (Docket No. 2007-OE-02 - LINK). DOE affi rmed the NIETC designation orders on March 10, 2008. 

 

Mid-Atlantic Area NIETC

The DOE issued its ruling confirming the inclusion of 52 Pennsylvania counties in the euphemistically named Mid-Atlantic "National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor". This newly conferred federal regulatory power will usurp traditional state regulation of electric transmission lines. 

This corridor designation will force huge new interstate high voltage lines upon the Pennsylvania landscape through the heavy handed use of new eminent domain powers. The threat to Pennsylvania is immense: two-thirds of the Commonwealth has been designated as part of the Mid-Atlantic National Electric Transmission Corridor. (See DOE Map

Proposed Powerlines

Southwest Area NIETC

A national electric corridor "threatens over 400,000 acres of roadless forest in southern California,” according to the California Wilderness Coalition.  (See DOE Map)

 

Opposition to Corridors

 

Additional Resources

Pennsylvania Land Trust Association. "The Impact of the Corridor: A Case Study from New York", March 10, 2008.

Pennsylvania Land Trust Association. "PJM Energy Markets Thrive Contrary to Forecast: Challenging Justification for Mid-Atlantic Corridor", March 10, 2008.

Observations by Andy Loza, Executive Director, Pennsylvania Land Trust Association. "National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor Threatens Pennsylvania Landowners, Local Control, Community Character, Public Health, Sensible Energy Policy, and National Security", January 30, 2008.

Pennsylvania Land Trust Association. "Re-examining the Need for the Mid-Atlantic National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor", January 16, 2008.

Pennsylvania Land Trust Association. "The Disconnect Between Transmission Corridor Data and Today's Energy Market", January 18, 2008.

DOE Designation Announcement in Federal Register ( Docket No. 2007–OE–01) 

DOE Congestion Studies (20092006)

U.S. Department of Energy NIETC Website 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Siting Website 

List of Counties Impacted by Corridor

MOU Among US Federal Agencies Re: Transmission Siting

Electric Transmission Congestion Areas According to US DOE (2008)


About Us

Vision, mission goals and more

Archive

Articles & newsletters

Listserv

Get updates & respond

RSS Rss

Subscribe to
our feed


Conservation Easement Assistance Program Technical Assistance Program Terms of Use

The people of the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association envision a prosperous Pennsylvania, where communities know that their treasured green places will endure. We envision a Commonwealth where the lands that guarantee our water quality are safeguarded; where every child can safely play at a nearby park; where our productive farmland and forests are protected, securing our food and timber supply; and where wild places are preserved for wildlife and people.

Thank you to the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources for supporting the Association’s conservation efforts.

© 2012 Pennsylvania Land Trust Association